<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pains and changes</title>
	<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/</link>
	<description>Faintly interesting adventures in hi-fi and holdem</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-3027</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-3027</guid>
					<description>To answer your last question, I'm all in favour of anyone joining in. As long as visitorare given enough pointers to help them work out how closely in general they match a reviewers opinions (ie what else have they reviewed, and did I agree with them or not on that?), the more the merrier.

I expect all this is being done a hundred times over right now.

I'm trying to imagine how this could open up into something social and collaborative (again without just copying what's already out there)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your last question, I&#8217;m all in favour of anyone joining in. As long as visitorare given enough pointers to help them work out how closely in general they match a reviewers opinions (ie what else have they reviewed, and did I agree with them or not on that?), the more the merrier.</p>
<p>I expect all this is being done a hundred times over right now.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to imagine how this could open up into something social and collaborative (again without just copying what&#8217;s already out there)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-3026</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-3026</guid>
					<description>The expensive way to trust reviews is to try them, I suppose. If you buy something on a recommendation and like it, it's starting to look more like you agree with the reviewers' opinions.

But then again just because you like something, or a few things, after reading a review by one person at site x, that doesn't mean that you'll like what any of their other reviewers like: that's something that can be really hard to pin down. Maybe I haven't tried hard enough but I've never found it that easy to cross-reference individual reviewers.

The horrible way is to go anywhere that has endless reviews by people that loved something. I always want to read the bad reviews rather than the fulsome praise, because that's where you're more likely to find reviews by people that have used and lived with the item, and found the flaws.

Having said all that, at the moment I'm just planning on a couple of things: one is to review all the media I own, and the second is to review anything and everything, but I'm not sure how that would work...

While I'm hat-tipping nice designs, I came across &lt;a href=http://www.schillmania.com/ class=&quot;extlink&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some lovely menus and pop-ups here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The expensive way to trust reviews is to try them, I suppose. If you buy something on a recommendation and like it, it&#8217;s starting to look more like you agree with the reviewers&#8217; opinions.</p>
<p>But then again just because you like something, or a few things, after reading a review by one person at site x, that doesn&#8217;t mean that you&#8217;ll like what any of their other reviewers like: that&#8217;s something that can be really hard to pin down. Maybe I haven&#8217;t tried hard enough but I&#8217;ve never found it that easy to cross-reference individual reviewers.</p>
<p>The horrible way is to go anywhere that has endless reviews by people that loved something. I always want to read the bad reviews rather than the fulsome praise, because that&#8217;s where you&#8217;re more likely to find reviews by people that have used and lived with the item, and found the flaws.</p>
<p>Having said all that, at the moment I&#8217;m just planning on a couple of things: one is to review all the media I own, and the second is to review anything and everything, but I&#8217;m not sure how that would work&#8230;</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m hat-tipping nice designs, I came across <a href=http://www.schillmania.com/ class="extlink" rel="nofollow">some lovely menus and pop-ups here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kyb</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2987</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2987</guid>
					<description>I was just moaning yesterday about how difficult it is to find good reviews that you trust.   CNET is pretty much the only place you'll find lots of reviews on google, and I don't trust them - they never go in depth and they don't seem to ever say anything really nasty about something.

Of course, dpreview is great for digital cameras.  I went looking for printer reviews, and found a site that gave an indepth. 6 page review of a few different printers, and yet somehow managed to neglect to mention the quality of the output.  Madness!

I'm interested to see how you'll do it - It's very useful in reviews to have comparisons with other items in it's class (particularly if they have a small turning circle), but it'd get expensive if you had to buy each one.  Are you thinking of getting other people to pitch in as well so you can get greater coverage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just moaning yesterday about how difficult it is to find good reviews that you trust.   CNET is pretty much the only place you&#8217;ll find lots of reviews on google, and I don&#8217;t trust them - they never go in depth and they don&#8217;t seem to ever say anything really nasty about something.</p>
<p>Of course, dpreview is great for digital cameras.  I went looking for printer reviews, and found a site that gave an indepth. 6 page review of a few different printers, and yet somehow managed to neglect to mention the quality of the output.  Madness!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to see how you&#8217;ll do it - It&#8217;s very useful in reviews to have comparisons with other items in it&#8217;s class (particularly if they have a small turning circle), but it&#8217;d get expensive if you had to buy each one.  Are you thinking of getting other people to pitch in as well so you can get greater coverage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2978</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2978</guid>
					<description>nice... spam guys. I appreciate the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice&#8230; spam guys. I appreciate the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ladowningmi</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2976</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2976</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: lhess9</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2975</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2975</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: williwat7</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2974</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2974</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kalexander46</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2973</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2973</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nowayouthere</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2972</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2972</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jaid7kakanfo</title>
		<link>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2971</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.neildewhurst.com/site-updates/pains-and-changes.html/#comment-2971</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pains and changes...&lt;/strong&gt;

nice.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pains and changes&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>nice&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
